Should we revascularize before implanting a pacemaker?


Creative Commons License

Yesil M., Bayata S., Arikan E., YILMAZ R., Postaci N.

Clinical Cardiology, cilt.31, sa.10, ss.498-501, 2008 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 31 Sayı: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2008
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/clc.20280
  • Dergi Adı: Clinical Cardiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.498-501
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Coronary artery disease, Pacemaker implantation, Revascularization
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Samsun Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: The effect of coronary revascularization on disappearance of the severe conduction disturbances is still unclear. Hypothesis: We sought to determine whether revascularization may induce recovery of sinus rhythm in patients with significant coronary artery disease and complete atrioventricular block (AVB). Methods: Fifty-three patients who had third-degree AVB and significant coronary artery disease were enrolled. Patients with acute coronary syndromes were excluded. Thirty-three (62%) patients were men and the mean age was 65±10 y. All patients received a permanent dual-mode, dual-pacing, dual-sensing (DDD) pacemaker. Coronary disease was treated medically in 16 (30%) patients due to patient preference or ineligibility. Thirty-seven (70%) patients underwent a revascularization procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]: 16, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]: 21 pts). Mean follow-up was 36±6 mo and patients were evaluated every 3 mo according to their resting electrocardiograms (ECGs) at each visit. Results: In the medically treated group, 13 (81%) patients still had third-degree AVBs at the end of the follow-up period, while 3 (19%) patients returned to normal sinus rhythm. On the other hand, 27 out of 37 patients (73%) who were revascularized were still in complete AVB, and 10 patients from this group (27%) had returned to normal sinus rhythm. There was no statistically significant difference between the revascularized and medically treated groups in terms of need for a pacemaker. Conclusions: Patients who have concomitant severe conduction disturbances and significant coronary disease may well receive a pacemaker before a revascularization procedure. Our data shows that coronary revascularization has little, if any, impact on returning to normal AV conduction. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.